As we all know, much has changed since Fall 2019! We are working hard behind the scenes to bring this page up to date - thanks for your patience and flexibility.
You can "watch" this page to be notified of important updates - see instructions on the Collab Access page.
In the Fall of 2019, we created this collaborative resource to share information about the campus’s strategic efforts to reform the graduate student funding model. We are now augmenting this to encompass all major communications about this topic, organized chronologically in the table below. The FAQ resource can also still be found here.
Link to Resource
August 6, 2019
Recommendations from the Senate-Administration Workgroup on Graduate Funding
October 14, 2019
Graduate Student Funding Update (Memo from EVC and Graduate Dean to Campus)
November 8, 2019
Graduate Student Funding Reforms: An Update (Memo from EVC and Graduate Dean to Campus)
November 22, 2019
Review of the Senate Administration Workgroup on Graduate Funding Report (Memo from Maripat Corr, Chair of Academic Senate, to EVC)
Link to report: Graduate Funding Workgroup Report Response 11-22-19 (2).pdf
January 15, 2020
Letter, and one-page executive summary, from Graduate Dean to EVC re: The Graduate Division’s Proposed Next Steps in light of Senate Recommendations, and one-page executive summary of this letter
Link to letter: EVC ltr re Senate Grad Funding 01.15.20.pdf
Link to one-page Executive Summary: Graduate Student Funding Reform--Summary for Deans & Chairs.pdf
February 23, 2020
Summary Grid: Increasing Graduate Support at UC San Diego (created by the EVC’s office)
Link to Grid: Grad Support Summary 2020-02-21 (1).pdf
February 24, 2020
Supporting UC San Diego Graduate Students (Memo from EVC and Graduate Dean to Campus)
February 28, 2020
Notice to Students: Summer Employment Opportunities for Graduate Students
|November 3, 2020||Update - Proportional Funding Split for Graduate Tuition & Remission||Update - Proportional Funding Split for Graduate Tuition & Remission|
|February 2, 2021||Email Update on Graduate Student Funding for Chairs and Directors of Departments and Programs, College Provosts and Department Business Officers|
(--sent directly to the recipients.) This update summarized the plans for graduate funding reform in the areas of Block Grant and TA Allocation, and were the product of extensive consultations with the programs as well as a diverse focus group of department chairs and program directors, and conversations with deans and divisional budget officers.
NOTE: Program-specific allocation of Block Grant as well as the divisional value of TA Load was shared separately with each respective Dean.
We appreciate the efforts of all the campus partners who have collaborated in this revision of graduate resource allocation methods, which we hope will enable us to better support our graduate students in the coming years.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1.1: The memo seems to imply that all doctoral students are guaranteed five years of financial support, immediately. Is that true? (added on 11/7/19)
A1.1: No. As the opening sentence of the memo says, “We are… working toward a model (emphasis added) where all Doctoral students would be admitted with five years of guaranteed financial support.” The guarantee of five years of financial support does not begin immediately. We intend to reach that goal at some point in the future and to involve academic units and Senate Leadership in planning the implementation.
Q1.2: It does not seem like we will have adequate resources to both fund current students and admit a new class. Should we be suspending admissions? (added on 11/3/19, revised 11/7/19)
A1.2: The university does not intend to reduce support for graduate student funding. The graduate student funding reforms aim to help UC San Diego programs boost cohort diversity, strength, stability, and size. Departments should continue whatever they have done historically to make determinations about the appropriate size of their incoming cohort of students.
Q1.3: I understand that there was a workgroup on how the campus allocates Block Grant and Teaching Assistant funds. What is the status?
A1.3: The workgroup has submitted a report which is being reviewed by the Academic Senate and the Executive Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs’ Office. Stay tuned...
Q1.4: What is the overall implementation plan? (added on 3/6/20)
A1.4: The overall plan of implementation for all graduate funding reform, including what has already been accomplished, is summarized in the Summary Grid.
Questions about tuition/fee source
Q2.1: My department has been supporting a student as a 25% Teaching Assistant plus support from Block Grant. The Teaching Assistant tuition and fee pool has been paying all of the tuition and fee costs. Now it will be paying only a proportion. Where will the rest of the tuition and fee payments come from? Can the Teaching Assistant tuition and fee pool savings be added to the department’s Block Grant to help support the student?
A2.1: Yes. The university does not intend to spend less in support of Doctoral and MFA students. Because the same funding source is used for both the TA and Block Grant tuition and fees, we intend to rebalance the budget for these two allocations. Reconciliation of these matters will happen at the program level with input from deans and departments.
Q2.2: Does the requirement that “The cost of the tuition and fee payments and other benefits will be charged proportionally across the funding sources of the student’s support” mean that if a student is supported on a 25% Teaching Assistant appointment and a 24.99% Graduate Student Research appointment that the Teaching Assistant funding and the grant funding will each be charged approximately half the cost of the tuition and fee payments and other benefits? What if my grant cannot afford the cost?
A2.2: The TA funding and the GSR funding would each be charged approximately half the cost of the tuition, student services fee, health insurance fees, and potentially other campus fees. Where allowable, grants should be submitted with budgets that include the proportional cost of tuition, fee payments, and other benefits. As a transition, faculty who experience budget challenges due to this change should make their department aware. We are committed to working with deans and departments to find a reasonable solution where there are gaps.
Questions about 50% equivalent funding
Important note (added 12/10/19):The original October 14th memo
The original October 14, 2019 memo indicated "Effective winter quarter, Doctoral and MFA students must besupported at
supported at a minimum of the equivalent of a 50% Teaching Assistantship.The minimum
The minimum may be met by a combination of appointments and/or fellowships.The
The student’s home department is responsible for monitoring theirlevel of
level of support. The Graduate Dean has the authority to grantlimited exceptions
limited exceptions to this policy when deemed appropriate and in thebest interest
best interest of the student."
The November 8th, 2019 update memo distributedto deans
to deans, department chairs, assistant deans, department business officers, and graduate coordinators,added
added an important clarification which reads, "However, at the suggestion of divisional partners, we are adding language to clarify the precise meaning of the first sentence so that it now reads, 'Effective winter quarter (2020), Doctoral and MFAstudents
students who were admitted with a guarantee of support must be supported at the minimum of the equivalent of a 50% Teaching Assistantship.'
Q3.3: What is the expectation/obligation (if any) to fund students for summer?
A3.3: At this time the minimum support level applies only to the academic year.
Q3.4: Does this reform now mean that a student will automatically be funded at the “50% Teaching Assistant level” even if they do not work? (revised 11/7/19)
A3.4: No. The intention is that students with established commitments of support will receive a combination of graduate financial support equivalent to that of a 50% TA appointment. The mix of all funding sources should add up to at least the equivalent of a 50% TA appointment. The reform does not involve completely replacing TA appointments with fellowship funding.
Q3.5: Does the minimum level of support requirement mean that if a student has a 25% Teaching Assistant appointment they will be paid a stipend equivalent to what they would earn with a 50% appointment, even if they only work at the 25% level?
A3.5: No. The percentage of effort for a given TA appointment must match the level of the appointment. Supplemental fellowship funding should not be considered part of the employment appointment. The reform efforts make no change to the employment rules for TA or Graduate Student Researcher (GSR) or other employment opportunities for students.
Q3.6: Does the requirement that “Doctoral and MFA students must be supported at a minimum of the equivalent of a 50% Teaching Assistant” mean that students must be employed as a 50% Teaching Assistant?
A3.6: No. The idea is that the total support from any and all sources should be at least equivalent to that of a 50% Teaching Assistant appointment, including the associated tuition and fee benefit, for the academic year. As of October 2019, the minimum support amount is $2,435/month for 9 months.
Q3.7: Can the requirement that “Doctoral and MFA students must be supported at a minimum of the equivalent of a 50% Teaching Assistant” be met by support from outside the Campus?
A3.7: Possibly. The Graduate Division will consider exception petitions for students who have outside support. These situations will be examined on a case-by-case basis.
Q3.8: What happens if a unit only has Teaching Assistant opportunities for their students and the student does not want to work at 50% time? (revised 11/7/19)
A3.8: If a student does not wish to work 50% time, The Graduate Division will consider an exception petition from the student (the process for this is forthcoming), so long as it is clear that the student understands the implications of not being funded at a 50% level, and that doing so is in the best interests of the student.
If a unit only has TA funding and a student elects to not accept this type of funding, then the student will need to explore other funding opportunities that might exist across the university.
Q3.9: Item 3 of the memo says, “Effective winter quarter, Doctoral and MFA students must be supported at a minimum of the equivalent of a 50% Teaching Assistantship.” My department only has TA opportunities to offer me. I don’t want to work as a TA. Does that mean that my department must nonetheless find another way to fund me at “50% level” even if I reject the funding opportunities offered to me? (added on 11/7/19)
A3.9: No. TA opportunities are the main avenue by which many departments are able to fund graduate students. Students who are offered these opportunities may certainly choose to decline them. However, the departments are not obligated to fill a funding gap that is created when a student declines the funding opportunities extended to them.
Q3.10: What happens if a student is offered a Teaching Assistant opportunity outside of their home department and declines the opportunity? (added on 11/7/19)
A3.10: If a student elects to decline this type of support, then the student will need to explore other funding opportunities that might exist across the university and/or apply for extramural funding. The home department is not obligated to find the student other opportunities.
Q3.11: Does the minimum support level apply to students on an academic Leave of Absence or who are “In Absentia” status?
A3.11: Students on an academic Leave of Absence are not eligible for graduate student financial support from the university. Exceptions for students who are In Absentia will be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Proposed support levels should be included with In Absentia requests using The Graduate Division’s In Absentia App in the Student Database.
Q3.12: Is it allowable to reduce the minimum level of support if a student is not making satisfactory progress towards their degree? (added on 11/7/19)A3.12: No. If a student is still in the program, but having academic difficulty, the department may not reduce the minimum level of support. If a student’s lack of progress causes them to be separated from the program, support ceases at the point where the student is separated from the program.